Im not sure I agree with the 'most people dont look at burlesque as striptease' arguement. Ask joe bloggs on the street what Burlesque is and theyll use the words strip or striptease. To be honest, and ive said this before, I think alot of the so called 'parody' in the more 'authentic' Burlesque shows goes completely over the heads of most show goers. I think theres a vast difference between what you do Red and what the likes of myself does - you are obviously more circus orientated whereas im happy as larry to consider myself a striptease with Burlesque leanings.
I completely and utterly support the notion of traditional Burlesque but I feel somewhat alientated at times with so much talk of authentic by the book Burlesque. Maybe im just not a fan of living by the rules and checking in the dictionary anytime I use a phrase like Burlesque - but after all, isnt this all about entertainment? None of us are historians - we're entertainers!
I just worry that Burlesque in the UK is becoming a little too serious and high brow for my own tastes. What REALLY worries me is that striptease is almost a dirty word around here now. We all do it - most Burlesque performers routines feature striptease...it almost looks to me like the 'authentic burlesque' arguement is perhaps a way of masking the striptease element?
I guess I can round up this rant with simply 'each to their own'. We're all different in our own right...why worry about the definitions? 'Together We Can Can' is less viable in a community that is showing early signs of forming cliques
- E
(excuse the essay...way too much caffiene this afternoon!)